Mariano Azuela’s the Underdogs

Mariano Azuelas The Underdogs, is more or less a brotherhood of the Mexi keep people taking a expedition with lonesome(prenominal) one thing on their mind revenge a gullst Huerta and the Federales. In this story, we as the referee argon confronted with characters, such as Demetrio Macias, who is destined to place his people into the depths of retaining an incorrupt lifestyle and hopes to find peace from the effect of war. Although Demetrio is seen as one of the main characters in the legend, we are to a fault briefly move in the other subversive forces under Pancho Villa, Carranza, Obregon, and by peasants under Zapata.These appositional forces gain strength against the Huerta g overn manpowert as well. The Underdogs almost symbolizes a redbreast Hood story, in which, Demetrio and his peasant guerrilla forces revolt against a high commanding army of the govern ment, that relies on corrupting the lives of innocent people. After indicant the unfermented, the appendix which follows, brought on a wide range of comparisons and contrasts between the put on story and the real events of the Mexican Revolution.To obtain, The Underdogs is depicted as a circulatory brisk in which, Azuela suggests that Demetrio and his men never make any patterned advance geographically, except instead are going around in circles. We can scarce assume that Azuela does this on purpose to make room for what he thinks is a literary connection between the story and the Revolution, in verbal expression that the Revolution was ineffective and unsuccessful(p. 93). Although this example does not really tie into a universal agreement with the effects on the Mexican Revolution, it is interesting to gain an understanding on w here Azeulas thoughts are indoors his invigorated.However, the debate a deck ups when the outlet of ignorance and confusion is introduced. The appendix contests that Demetrio and his army do not obtain a revolutionary mind set when it comes to fighting th e Federales. Instead, they involve more of a personal response. For example, one of the stand uplious peasants under Demetrio, whose name is Guero Margarito, says HeGeneral Orozco slapped my face when I was a waiter at Delmonicos in Chihuaha(p. 62). We as the ref are submitted into a personal motivation that is driving Guero to take social function in this Revolution.We are likewise informed in the beginning of the novel that Demetrio has a personal reason for joining up with the rebel forces, when he was persecuted by a powerful landowner and political boss. There also lies a demoralization at heart Demetrio pertaining to revolutionary decisions. At one intend he says, Truth is I dont understand these here politics(p. 71) and at another point in the story, he depicts a puzzling understanding toward General Natera when Demetrio is asked if hes going to spatial relation with Villa or Carranza.Both of these examples equally show Demetrios fundamental comprehension of the Revo lution, which further justifies his intimacy in it for personal reasons sort of than political ones. Azuela also dramatizes on the caudillismo, which means, the determination to follow the lead of strong men because of personal allegiance rather than political conviction. We see that Demetrio is a strong follower of this definition, in that he will gladly do what a strong man, such as Natera, will command him to do, without having to understand any political bounds.In comparison to the novel to the history, it is true that Demetrio and his men were very poor and unequipped when it came to uniforms and weapons, as contend to the Federales who did obtain a more bountiful amount of armory and refreshful technological advances, such as the machine gun, which played a brawny role in demolishing the rebel forces. In contrast to the gruelling duty weapons that the Federales acquired, the Mexican rebels only had the tools that they secured off of the enemy dead, like knives, do-it-yo urself weapons and the limited amount of rifles.Through the novel, Azuela writes as if we are seeing a broken yet brave army with knives stand tall and victorious over a much larger group of soldiers with machine guns. However, when we read about a past historical battle between the rebels and the Federales, a revolutionary officer named Solis tells of how his soldiers were mown down by the machine gun eruption(p. 97). But, in the story, we read that Demetrio and his soldiers charge up a hill and clapper the Federales, while Demetrio lassoes machine guns, roping them as if they were wild bulls(p. 43).We can only accept Azuelas decision to make it seem like the rebel forces had a come about against the Federales when indeed, they had a very slim possibility in succeeding. Although Azuela leaves out some true historical events, the appendix comments on how Azuelas unique and descriptive style of writing still leaves a important connection between the novel and the referee. For example, in one passage, Azuela describes the Villista airplanes in action, referring to them as something the peasants in Mexico can relate to. He first compares them to a canoe, accordingly to an automobile, and then to bombs to the act of feeding chickens.However, it is important to note that Villa and his legendary function del Norte are never seen in the novel, but the appendix does not argue that Azuelas writing is very rich in respect to connecting the readers perception of war with his words. This also generates the panoramic atmosphere that Azuela brings across in his writing when really he is rather focusing on a limited scope(p. 98). Azuelas main focus in the novel is not trained on the vast historical sweep or ideological intricacies of the Revolution his deepest interest is in its most humble protagonists(p. 99).This quotation from the appendix invites a very important question what was Azuela thinking when he named the book, The Underdogs? Demetrio and his men are against all odds of winning the Mexican Revolution, but if we think about this question in a wider retrospect, when we actually begin to understand Demetrio or Luis Cervantess character even, we would agree with the appendix that these men are nothing compared to underdogs. Yes, they have come from the bottom of society, however, they are forthwith fighting for something that they believe in, their interests, and they are on the winning side(p. 9). The reader is brought into a view of men who have distinguishable to meet and rise into arms against the corruptions and injustices of their lives. In reconnecting back to the panoramic statement, the appendix comments on Azuelas approach on fragmenting his writing and lacking history within the Revolution. within this technique, he decides to write about the things that he himself witnessed and merely ignores the experiences of famous leadership of the Revolution like Villa, Carranza, Obregon or Zapata.Even when General Natera is in a tantrum with Demetrio, Azuela simply does not paint any interesting emotion within his character. Instead, Azuela is clearly focused on connecting the reader with the underdogs in any chance he gets. The appendix describes that, Their faces, expressions, actions, thoughts, hopes, and fears fill the pages of the novel(p. 100). Azuela has also been deliberately attacked with accusations regarding his misunderstand of the Mexican Revolution in regards to his fragmentary approach to writing The Underdogs.However, he simply explained in an interview that he was just trying to show the forest and not the trees or the ignorance of the abuses and the personal benefit from the Revolution(p. 101). In this case, Azuela did succeed. In reading Anita Brenners Review of the novel, she says that it is an isolated masterpiece however, she fears that there are still flaws within the novel. For example, she feels as though the story races and does not piddle like his other ones.She thinks that a foreign reader of Azuelas kick the bucket would mistake fatigue for futility and come to the conclusion that these rebel forces of men would have been killed for no practical purposes when their lives signified a spiritual change(p. 118). Since Azuela is not reason as a post-revolutionary idealist, a reader may think that these men died for a less heroic cause, when this isnt true at all. Brenner also comments on the lack of feeling she gets when reading the English version of the novel as opposed to the Spanish version.She ends with awkward and misunderstood phrases that the translator decided to use and remarks on how the greatest modern book can only be retained in its true Spanish tongue(p. 119). In conclusion, The Underdogs, by Mariana Azuela symbolizes a double-edged sword. In one viewing, it foreshadows the succession that Azuela mirrors within his words as applying a distinct focus on the protagonists the picturesque and real emotions depicted by Demetrio and his army. A nd in a second, more authoritative notion, almost fails to unite with the Mexican Revolution through Azuelas fragmentation approach and limit on historical events.